In Gujarat communities practicing
animal rearing traditionally are referred to as Maldharis
(pastoralists). Maldhari does not connote a caste or
a community but it signifies association with an occupation.
Maldhari is derived from Mal (livestock) + dhari (owner),
i.e. those who own livestock. In Gujarat Maldhari are
known as “Ter Tansalia” which comprises
of 13 different castes including Rabari, Bharwad, Ayar,
Charan, Gadhvi Mer, Chaudhari, Jat and Mutva. The origin
of Maldharis cannot be said with certainty. Some people
associate the origins of Rabaris to the Dravidians who
came from Afghanistan. Some people also say that Rabaris
and Ahirs came to Gujarat with Lord Krishna from Mathura
in Utttar Pradesh. In literature one can find mention
of 133 sub castes among Rabaris, six in Charan and two
in Bharwads.
In Gujarat the main concentration of Maldharis is
found in Ahmedabad, Mehsana, Banaskantha, Sabarkantha,
Bhavnagar, Junagarh, Jamnagar, Surendranagar, Rajkot
and Kutch districts. It has been stated in some records
that at one time there were 103 chariyans in Gujarat;
and in and around these chariyans Maldharis were settled.
Most of these chariyans are either encroached or degraded
resulting in forced migration of Maldharis for as
much as 9-10 months in a year.
The Maldharis and their cattle thrived on the grasslands.
They sold milk and milk products such as butter, ghee
and condensed milk (mava) to the nearby towns and
villages. The shepherds, among the Maldharis, also
sold wool and woolens that their women folk made with
their deft hands, carrying out fine embellishment
through intricate embroidery work. However the main
source of income was through bullock trading and Maldharis
are known to have produced some of the best breeds
of cattle.
Their life came in for a rude shock when, beginning
with the last decade of the 19th century, the plough
of the ‘civilized’ world started encroaching
on the grasslands to produce grain and cash crops
like cotton and groundnut. Agriculture for subsistence
was replaced by commercial farming. The rich eco-system
of the region, which sustained them for centuries,
was ravaged.
Since the pastoral communities and their cattle depended
on common property resources such as grasslands, forest,
ponds and rivers and did not own land, they were neither
counted nor consulted by the policy makers enacting
laws aimed at regulating the use and ownership of
land. Like the tribals, who lived in and survived
on the forest, and were deprived of ownership rights
over the forestland, the pastoral communities too
were deprived of their right over grasslands, ponds
and rivers. Natural resources that fell into the category
of common property steadily became private property,
the farmers, builders, contractors and industrial
houses having grabbed these resources through legal
or illegal means.
The Maldharis became the victims of the ‘development’
process unleashed by market-driven economy. With the
market pressure increasing on local resources, the
Maldharis and their cattle were forced into seasonal
distressed migration in search of fodder. The partition
of India in 1947 further added to the problem, as
it placed the lush green pasturelands of the Sindh
province out of bounds for the Maldharis in the newly
created Pakistan.
Uprooted from their homeland, the Maldharis today
lead a nomadic life, wandering hither and thither
along with their herds of cattle through the length
and breadth of India. Though constituting more than
one-fifth of the population of Gujarat, these pastoral
communities do not figure either in the electoral
rolls or in the development plans of the government.
They have become non-entities, left to fend for themselves.
Low literacy level among the Maldharis is the main
reason why very few members from the pastoral communities
are found in any significant positions in the government,
political parties, industry, educational institutions,
or for that matter in any of the organized sector.
It is a travesty of fate that the Maldharis, whose
traditional occupation has been animal husbandry,
have virtually no representation in the cooperative
dairy sector.